A Look Back at Two Icons
The Glock 19
The Glock 19, a product of Austrian engineering, has become a ubiquitous presence since its introduction. The Glock 19, and the Glock line in general, revolutionized the handgun market. Constructed with polymer frames and a simplified internal design, Glock handguns provided ease of use, reliability, and a level of durability that was previously unmatched. They quickly gained favor for their ability to function in adverse conditions, their straightforward operation, and their consistent performance, making the Glock 19 a favorite for personal defense, concealed carry, and law enforcement.
The Smith & Wesson MP 2.0
Enter the Smith & Wesson MP 2.0. The MP (Military & Police) line, originally conceived by Smith & Wesson, aimed to provide a competitive alternative to the Glock platform. The initial MP models had a mixed reception, but Smith & Wesson listened to user feedback and steadily refined their design. The MP 2.0 represents a significant evolution, addressing many of the shortcomings of its predecessors. The MP 2.0 boasts improved ergonomics, a more refined trigger, and enhanced features that set it apart from the original. The MP 2.0 has quickly become a major competitor, challenging Glock’s long-held dominance in the pistol market.
Size and Handling: A Feel for the Fit
One of the first considerations when choosing a handgun is the feel in the hand. The Glock 19, while compact, has a distinct grip angle that can be polarizing. Some shooters find the angle comfortable and natural, while others feel the need to cant the gun slightly to achieve a proper sight picture. The grip texture is also a consideration; the Glock 19’s original Gen 1-3 pistols had a smooth grip which can be challenging to hold onto when hands are wet. Subsequent generations have improved the grip texture, but the MP 2.0 excels in this area.
The MP 2.0, on the other hand, offers improved ergonomics. The MP 2.0’s grip features a more aggressive stippling or texturing, providing a secure hold even in wet conditions. Furthermore, the MP 2.0 often ships with interchangeable backstraps, allowing the shooter to customize the grip size to fit their hand comfortably. This feature is particularly beneficial for shooters with smaller or larger hands, promoting better control and potentially leading to improved accuracy.
Both firearms are relatively compact, making them well-suited for concealed carry. The Glock 19, with its slimmer profile, might offer a slight advantage in this regard. However, the MP 2.0’s comfortable grip and more pronounced grip texture can also contribute to a secure and confident draw from concealment. The choice between the two often comes down to individual hand size, grip preference, and the specific holster chosen.
Caliber and Capacity: Rounds Downrange
Both the MP 2.0 vs Glock 19 are primarily chambered in 9mm, a popular and versatile caliber for personal defense and law enforcement. This ammunition offers a balance of stopping power, manageable recoil, and cost-effectiveness. Both models are also available in some other calibers, although they are not as common.
The standard magazine capacity of the Glock 19 is typically fifteen rounds, although larger capacity magazines are available. This capacity provides a sufficient number of rounds for a defensive situation. The MP 2.0 typically offers a comparable capacity, ensuring both pistols provide ample firepower when needed.
Trigger and Action: Pulling the Trigger
The trigger is a critical component of any handgun, as it directly affects accuracy and control. The Glock 19’s trigger is known for its simplicity and predictability. However, many shooters find the trigger pull to be somewhat mushy, with a longer travel distance and a less distinct reset. While the Glock 19 trigger is reliable and consistent, it may not be the best option for those prioritizing crispness and a precise trigger pull.
The MP 2.0 shines in this area. Smith & Wesson made significant improvements to the trigger in the MP 2.0, resulting in a crisper break and a more tactile reset. Many shooters prefer the MP 2.0 trigger over the Glock 19’s due to its shorter travel, lighter pull weight, and more defined reset. This improved trigger feel can lead to greater accuracy and faster follow-up shots, crucial aspects in a defensive scenario. The MP 2.0’s trigger offers a clear advantage in terms of overall trigger feel, allowing the shooter to have more control and better shot placement.
Sights and Target Acquisition: Lining Up the Shot
Both the MP 2.0 vs Glock 19 can be equipped with various sight options. The standard sights on both pistols are typically three-dot sights, which are easy to acquire and are familiar to most shooters. However, both models offer options for upgrading to more advanced sights.
The Glock 19 has a wide variety of aftermarket sight options, including tritium night sights for low-light conditions and red-dot optic mounts. The MP 2.0 can also be fitted with night sights, and the MP 2.0 offers optics-ready models that are designed to accept red dot sights directly, providing for easy attachment and customization. The choice of sights will depend on individual preference and intended use.
Safety Features: Protecting the Shooter
Both the Glock 19 and the MP 2.0 incorporate several safety features to prevent accidental discharges. The Glock 19 utilizes a combination of internal safeties, including a trigger safety, a firing pin safety, and a drop safety. This design prioritizes simplicity and ease of use.
The MP 2.0 follows a similar philosophy, incorporating internal safeties. The MP 2.0 often has a manual safety option, allowing the shooter to manually engage a safety lever if desired. However, a manual safety is not present on all models. Whether or not a manual safety is desired is a personal preference. Both models are considered safe when handled responsibly.
Materials and Construction: Built to Last
The Glock 19 is known for its durability and reliability. The Glock 19’s frame is constructed from a high-strength polymer, making it lightweight, impact-resistant, and impervious to the effects of weather and corrosion. The slide is typically made from steel, treated with a tough finish for protection against wear and tear.
The MP 2.0 follows a similar construction philosophy. The frame is made from polymer, while the slide is also made from steel. Smith & Wesson frequently uses a durable finish on the slide and barrel, further enhancing the pistol’s resistance to corrosion. Both firearms are built to withstand extensive use and harsh conditions, ensuring they can be relied upon when needed.
Accuracy and Recoil: Controlling the Shot
Accuracy is a primary concern for any firearm. Both the MP 2.0 vs Glock 19 are capable of excellent accuracy, although individual results may vary. The Glock 19 is known for its inherent accuracy, and many shooters find it easy to achieve tight groups at various distances. The MP 2.0, with its improved trigger, is often considered to have a slight edge in accuracy. The MP 2.0 allows for greater shot placement because the trigger is more comfortable, lighter, and features a quicker reset. Ultimately, the shooter’s skill and experience play a significant role in determining accuracy.
Recoil management is another critical aspect of shooting performance. The Glock 19 has a reputation for having relatively manageable recoil due to its weight and ergonomics. The MP 2.0, with its enhanced grip texture and ergonomic design, also excels in recoil management. Both pistols are easy to control during rapid firing, making them suitable for both experienced shooters and those new to handguns.
Reliability and Ergonomics: Ensuring Functionality
Reliability is paramount for any self-defense weapon. The Glock 19 has a long-standing reputation for being exceptionally reliable, and it has earned the trust of law enforcement and military personnel worldwide. The Glock 19’s simple design and robust construction contribute to its remarkable consistency.
The MP 2.0 has also proven to be highly reliable. Smith & Wesson has invested heavily in improving the MP line’s reliability, and the MP 2.0 has a stellar reputation for consistent performance. Many users have reported the MP 2.0 vs Glock 19 being on par with the Glock 19 in terms of reliability.
Ergonomics play a significant role in the overall shooting experience. As mentioned previously, the MP 2.0 has a distinct advantage in ergonomics. The MP 2.0’s interchangeable backstraps, more aggressive grip texturing, and overall design contribute to a comfortable and secure grip, which can lead to better control, faster target acquisition, and overall ease of use.
The Pros and Cons: Weighing the Choices
The Glock 19 is renowned for its reliability, its simple design, and its widespread aftermarket support. It has a proven track record in real-world scenarios and is an excellent choice for both beginners and experienced shooters. Some potential drawbacks include its grip angle, which may not suit all hands, and the trigger, which some find mushy.
The MP 2.0 is known for its improved ergonomics, its crisper trigger, and its competitive performance. The MP 2.0 has an aggressive grip texture that provides an extremely secure grip, and the trigger is better than most other factory triggers. The MP 2.0, however, may have a slightly smaller aftermarket support compared to Glock, though the MP 2.0 is still a popular option for customization.
Customization and Availability: Building Your Perfect Pistol
Both the Glock 19 and the MP 2.0 boast extensive aftermarket support, but in terms of sheer variety, the Glock 19 still holds a slight edge. Glock 19 parts and accessories are incredibly widespread, including a wide range of holsters, sights, triggers, barrels, and other modifications. The MP 2.0 has a robust aftermarket, as well, but the options aren’t as extensive as the Glock 19.
The Glock 19 is widely available from various firearms retailers. The MP 2.0 is also commonly available, although availability can vary depending on the specific model and local market.
Cost and Value: Price and Performance
The MP 2.0 vs Glock 19 are comparable in price, although this can vary depending on the specific model, features, and retailer. Both pistols offer excellent value for the price. Both models offer good quality, reliability, and performance for the money.
Which One Is Right for You: Making the Decision
Ultimately, the “better” pistol depends on individual needs and preferences. The Glock 19 remains a strong contender for its reliability, simplicity, and aftermarket support. It is an excellent choice for concealed carry, home defense, and various other applications.
The MP 2.0, however, presents a compelling alternative. Its improved ergonomics, crisper trigger, and aggressive grip texture make it a standout choice for shooters seeking enhanced comfort and control. The MP 2.0 is excellent for concealed carry, target shooting, or for competition.
If you prioritize ergonomics, trigger feel, and a more modern design, the MP 2.0 may be the better choice. If you value simplicity, a proven track record, and abundant aftermarket support, the Glock 19 remains a solid option. The best way to make a decision is to handle and shoot both pistols, if possible, to see which one feels best in your hands. Consider your intended use and shooting experience to make the best choice for your needs.
In Closing
The MP 2.0 vs Glock 19 are both excellent handguns. These pistols represent the best of the industry. Whether you’re a seasoned shooter or a first-time gun owner, careful consideration of these factors will help you determine which pistol best suits your needs. Choosing between them is a personal decision, so take the time to compare both options.
